Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice or Microsoft Word document file format.
  • The text is single-spaced with a space between paragraphs; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed at the appropriate points within the text, rather than at the end.
  • Quotations from texts of 40 words or over should be indented (i.e.placed as a separate paragraph) without quotation marks. Quotations from participants should similarly be indented if 40 words or over; they should not be in italics.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic (i.e. referencing) requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.

Author Guidelines

Thank you for choosing to submit your paper to the European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy

Our recommended maximum word count for articles/papers is 8000 words, including title, abstract, tables, references and any endnotes. (Please discuss any variations with the Editor.) Reviews and short reports should be no longer than 2000 words.

All submissions need to comply with the following:

  • The author ensures that their research has been conducted in an ethical and responsible manner with attention paid to legal requirements and relevant professional guidelines.
  • A separate title page with author details is attached with the following information (which will get published within the article): i. work position/ institution; ii. email address/contact details; iii. authorship declaration statement (confirming authorship and statement that there are no competing interests or interests are transparently declared).
  • The paper starts with a summarising abstract of fewer than 200 words. In the case of empirical research reports, the abstract should clearly state the research aims, methodology, findings and conclusions.
  • For empirical research papers, the standard headings of Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Findings and Discussion (of findings and critical evaluation of methodology) is recommended though not essential.
  • The author ensures that the source of all cited and reproduced material is appropriately acknowledged and adheres to the particular referencing requirements outlined in the APA Guidelines (6th edition). For example:
    • Journal article:

      Hill, H.R.M., Crowe, T.P., & Gonsalvez, C.J. (2016).  Reflective dialogue in clinical supervision: A pilot study involving collaborative review of supervision videos. Psychotherapy Research, 26(3), 263–278.

      Hamfi, A.G. (1981). The funny nature of dogs. E-journal of Applied Psychology, 2(2), 38-48. Retrieved from http://ojs.lib.swin.edu.au/index.php/fdo

    • Book:

      Rowan, J., & Jacobs, M. (2002). The therapist’s use of self. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    • Chapter:

      Wertz, F.J. (1985). Methods and findings in an empirical analysis of "being criminally victimized." In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 155-216). Pittsburgh,  PA: Duquesne University Press.

    • Translated book:

      Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)

    • Webpage:

      Victoria Transcultural Mental Health (2017). Working with Interpreters: A resource for service providers engaging with interpreters in transcultural situations. Retrieved from http://www.vtmh-workingwithinterpreters.online/

Review Process

On receipt of the article, the Editor will remove all reference to the author’s identity and will send the article to appropriate members of the review panel for a blind review. The Editor will then return review comments to you (anonymously), offering supportive guidance and suggesting relevant edits, if publication is recommended (without changes or with minor or major edits requested). Decisions to publish will be based on the paper’s relevance, quality, originality, interest and clarity given the remit and readership of the journal.  Reviewers will consider if the research methodology adopted is appropriate and whether the author/s demonstrate sufficient critical thinking, rigour, trustworthiness, and reflexivity. They might also comment on the clarity of the writing and/or suggest further attention is paid to ensure APA referencing guidelines have been consistently followed.

Copyright

The copyright of content in the European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the Journal. Journal articles are published as Open Access under a Creative Commons License which allows free download and use of the articles with appropriate attribution (to both the author and European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy) for educational and other non-commercial use.

Privacy Statement

 
Data protection: The names and email addresses supplied to the Journal will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this Journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party without permission.